🔗 Share this article

The veteran filmmaker is now considered not just a historical storyteller; his name is a franchise, an unparalleled production entity. With each new documentary series premiering on the PBS network, everyone seeks an interview.

Burns has done “more fucking podcasts than I ever thought possible”, he notes, wrapping up of his marathon promotional journey comprising four dozen cities, dozens of preview events and innumerable conversations. “There seems to be a podcast for every citizen, and I believe I’ve appeared on most of them.”

Thankfully Burns possesses boundless energy, as loquacious behind the mic as he is accomplished in the editing room. At seventy-two has traveled from prestigious venues to popular podcasts to promote his latest monumental work: The American Revolution, an extensive six-episode, twelve-hour film project that occupied a substantial portion of his recent years and arrived this week on public television.

Classic Documentary Style

Similar to traditional cooking in today’s rapid-consumption era, Burns’ latest project proudly conventional, more redolent of The World at War as opposed to modern digital documentaries and podcast series.

But for Burns, whose entire filmography documenting American historical narratives spanning various American subjects, its origin story is not just another subject but fundamental. “I recently told collaborator Sarah Botstein the other day, and she agreed: no future work will carry greater importance,” Burns reflects from his New York base.

Comprehensive Scholarly Work

Burns, co-directors Botstein and David Schmidt plus scripting partner Geoffrey Ward utilized numerous historical volumes and primary source materials. Dozens of historians, spanning age and perspective, offered expert analysis along with leading scholars representing multiple disciplines including slavery, indigenous peoples’ narratives plus colonial history.

Distinctive Filmmaking Approach

The style of the series will feel familiar to fans of historical documentaries. The characteristic technique included methodical photographic exploration through archival photographs, generous use of period music and actors voicing historical documents.

Those projects established the filmmaker cemented his status; years later, now the doyen of documentaries, he can apparently summon any actor he chooses. Collaborating with the filmmaker at a New York gathering, renowned playwright Lin-Manuel Miranda noted: “A call from Ken Burns commands immediate acceptance.”

Remarkable Ensemble

The lengthy creation process provided advantages in terms of flexibility. Sessions happened in studios, in relevant places using online technology, an approach adopted throughout the health crisis. Burns explains working with Josh Brolin, who scheduled a brief window while in Georgia to perform his role portraying the founding father prior to departing to other professional obligations.

The cast includes Kenneth Branagh, Hugh Dancy, Claire Danes, established Hollywood talent, Domhnall Gleeson, Amanda Gorman, Jonathan Groff, household names and rising talent, celebrated film and stage performers, international acting community, Edward Norton, David Oyelowo, Mandy Patinkin, Wendell Pierce, Matthew Rhys, Liev Schreiber, plus additional notable names.

Burns emphasizes: “Frankly, this may be the best single cast ever assembled for any movie or television show. Their contributions are remarkable. Selection wasn’t based on fame. It irritated me when questioned, about the prominent cast. I explained, ‘These are artists.’ They represent global acting excellence and they can bring this stuff alive.”

Multifaceted Story

Still, the lack of surviving participants, visual documentation required the filmmakers to lean heavily on historical documents, integrating individual perspectives of numerous historical characters. This allowed them to introduce audiences not just the famous founders of that era along with multiple who are seminal to the story”, many of whom lack visual representation.

Burns additionally pursued his particular enthusiasm for maps and spatial representation. “Maps fascinate me,” he comments, “and there are more maps in this project compared to previous works I’ve done combined.”

International Impact

The production crew recorded at numerous significant sites throughout the continent plus English locations to preserve geographical atmosphere and collaborated substantially with living history participants. All these elements combine to tell a story more brutal, complicated and internationally important than the one taught in schools.

The revolution, it contends, represented more than local dispute over land, taxation and representation. Instead the film portrays a violent confrontation that finally engaged multiple global powers and improbably came to embody described as “humanity’s highest ideals”.

Civil War Reality

Early dissatisfaction and objections directed toward Britain by colonial residents in 13 fractious colonies quickly evolved into a vicious internal war, setting brother against brother and neighbour against neighbour. During the second installment, scholar Alan Taylor notes: “The greatest misconception about the American Revolution involves believing it represented a consolidating event for colonists. This ignores the truth that it was a civil war among Americans.”

Sophisticated Interpretation

In his view, the independence account that “generally is drowning in sentimentality and idealization and lacks depth and insufficiently honors actual events, all contributors and the incredible violence of it.

It was, he contends, a revolution that proclaimed the transformative concept of the unalienable rights of people; a bloody domestic struggle, pitting Patriots against Loyalists; and a worldwide engagement, another installment in a sequence of struggles among European powers for dominance in the New World.

Contingent Historical Events

The filmmaker also sought {to rediscover the